Re: [PATCH 1/2] i_version update - vfs part

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <jean-noel.cordenner@...>
Cc: <linux-ext4@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, October 5, 2007 - 8:58 pm

On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 17:28 +0200, Cordenner jean noel wrote:
Hi Jean Noel,


Just to make sure, is this vfs patch and next ext4 patch together going
to replace the 4 inode-version related patches currently in
ext4-patch-queue (and git tree)? 


I suspect we need a lock here,  the places where need to update the
inode->i_version are already doing update for inode, mostly protected by
i_mutex. 

You could remove the above function and update the counter directly at
the places it need to.


Seems unnecessary.


Need to update the counter in libfs.c?


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1/2] i_version update - vfs part, Cordenner jean noel, (Fri Oct 5, 11:28 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] i_version update - vfs part, Cordenner jean noel, (Thu Oct 25, 1:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] i_version update - vfs part, Mingming Cao, (Thu Oct 25, 5:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] i_version update - vfs part, Jean noel Cordenner, (Tue Nov 20, 12:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] i_version update - vfs part, Mingming Cao, (Fri Oct 5, 8:58 pm)