Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Friday, October 5, 2007 - 1:43 pm

Andrew Morton wrote:

Except, unfortunately, DMA_64BIT_MASK.  I guess we could special case
it, assuming this works in all the contexts the macro is used in (ie,
compile-time constant?):

#define DMA_BIT_MASK(n)	(((n) == 64) ? ~0ULL : ((1ULL<<(n))-1))



    J
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1, Borislav Petkov, (Tue Sep 18, 12:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1, Satyam Sharma, (Wed Sep 19, 8:03 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1, Andrew Morton, (Fri Oct 5, 12:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Oct 5, 1:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1, Andrew Morton, (Fri Oct 5, 2:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1, Robert P. J. Day, (Fri Oct 5, 2:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Oct 5, 2:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1, Andreas Schwab, (Fri Oct 5, 2:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Oct 5, 2:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1, Andrew Morton, (Fri Oct 5, 3:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Oct 5, 3:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1, Borislav Petkov, (Sat Oct 6, 12:54 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1, Borislav Petkov, (Sat Oct 6, 1:37 am)