login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
October
»
5
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Timur Tabi <timur@...>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
Date: Friday, October 5, 2007 - 4:07 pm
Andreas Schwab wrote:
quoted text
> The bit mapping on your device is strictly internal to the device and > has nothing to do with bit order on the C level.
Then I don't understand that point of defining __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD. What does it mean for a C-level bitfield ordering to be little-endian if the processor is BIG_ENDIAN? -- Timur Tabi Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
__LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Fri Oct 5, 2:27 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Fri Oct 5, 2:35 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Fri Oct 5, 3:35 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Anton Altaparmakov
, (Fri Oct 5, 5:06 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Fri Oct 5, 5:10 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Lennart Sorensen
, (Tue Oct 9, 1:46 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Tue Oct 9, 1:56 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Tue Oct 9, 2:50 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Tue Oct 9, 3:11 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Tue Oct 9, 3:39 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Tue Oct 9, 5:40 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Tue Oct 9, 6:34 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, linux-os (Dick Johnson)
, (Wed Oct 10, 8:05 am)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Tue Oct 9, 2:57 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Tue Oct 9, 3:37 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Tue Oct 9, 3:44 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Tue Oct 9, 6:11 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Lennart Sorensen
, (Tue Oct 9, 2:34 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Andreas Schwab
, (Fri Oct 5, 5:29 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Fri Oct 5, 5:32 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Andreas Schwab
, (Fri Oct 5, 7:17 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Fri Oct 5, 3:43 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Fri Oct 5, 3:47 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Andreas Schwab
, (Fri Oct 5, 4:04 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Fri Oct 5, 4:07 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Andreas Schwab
, (Fri Oct 5, 5:17 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, linux-os (Dick Johnson)
, (Fri Oct 5, 4:34 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Timur Tabi
, (Fri Oct 5, 4:37 pm)
Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
, (Fri Oct 5, 7:27 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Justin C. Sherrill
Re: pkgsrc bulk build and tiff
Linus Torvalds
Linux 2.6.27-rc5
Ingo Molnar
[crash, bisected] Kernel BUG at ffffffff8079afb1 (__netif_schedule())
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Evgeniy Polyakov
Re: tbench wrt. loopback TSO
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
3 users
and
721 guests
online.
Online users
Jeremy
felicia876
jimwellson
Syndicate