Re: [PATCH for testing] Re: Decreasing stime running confuses top

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...>, Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...>, Willy Tarreau <w@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Ilpo <ilpo.jarvinen@...>, Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Date: Friday, October 5, 2007 - 11:49 am

On Thursday 04 October 2007, you wrote:

Yes, this gives steady increases.
For kontact it also again shows updates only once every minute. I really 
wonder where all the other fluctuations for contact come from with the 
alternative code.

It seems to me that this patch would be the best option for 2.6.23.

Tested-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
top displaying 9999% CPU usage, Frans Pop, (Wed Oct 3, 8:33 am)
Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage, Alexander E. Patrakov, (Wed Oct 3, 9:03 am)
Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage, Frans Pop, (Wed Oct 3, 10:04 am)
Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage, Ilpo Järvinen, (Wed Oct 3, 10:43 am)
Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage, Ilpo Järvinen, (Wed Oct 3, 10:51 am)
Re: Decreasing stime running confuses top, Chuck Ebbert, (Thu Oct 4, 3:32 pm)
Re: Decreasing stime running confuses top, Christian Borntraeger, (Thu Oct 4, 4:00 pm)
Re: Decreasing stime running confuses top, Chuck Ebbert, (Thu Oct 4, 4:21 pm)
[PATCH for testing] Re: Decreasing stime running confuses top, Christian Borntraeger, (Thu Oct 4, 5:10 pm)
Re: [PATCH for testing] Re: Decreasing stime running confuse..., Frans Pop, (Fri Oct 5, 11:49 am)
Re: [PATCH for testing] Re: Decreasing stime running confuse..., Christian Borntraeger, (Mon Oct 8, 12:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH for testing] Re: Decreasing stime running confuse..., Christian Borntraeger, (Thu Oct 4, 6:31 pm)
Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage, Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 3, 8:52 am)