Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Chuck Ebbert
Date: Thursday, October 4, 2007 - 5:10 pm

On 10/04/2007 07:58 PM, William Cattey wrote:

I think maybe a better question is: why does read_edid still work?
The X server might be making some invalid assumption about system
state. Comparing the code the two programs use could provide some clues.

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers, William Cattey, (Tue Sep 25, 4:38 pm)
Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Sep 28, 5:58 pm)
Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers, William Cattey, (Fri Sep 28, 6:13 pm)
Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Sep 28, 11:06 pm)
Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Sep 28, 11:09 pm)
Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers, William Cattey, (Mon Oct 1, 3:30 pm)
Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Oct 1, 4:49 pm)
Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers, Chuck Ebbert, (Tue Oct 2, 9:44 am)
Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers, William Cattey, (Thu Oct 4, 4:58 pm)
Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers, Chuck Ebbert, (Thu Oct 4, 5:10 pm)