login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
October
»
4
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: David Miller
Subject:
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
Date: Thursday, October 4, 2007 - 2:05 pm
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:58:12 -0600
quoted text
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 01:48:34PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > There comes a point where it is the reporter's responsibility to help > > the developer come up with a publishable test case the developer can > > use to work on fixing the problem and help ensure it stays fixed. > > That's a lot of effort. Is it more effort than doing some remote > debugging with Christoph? I don't know.
That's a good question and an excellent point. I'm sure that, either way, Christoph will be more than willing to engage and assist. -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Tue Sep 18, 8:36 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Thu Sep 27, 2:42 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Thu Sep 27, 10:14 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Sep 28, 10:33 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Fri Sep 28, 10:55 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Sep 28, 11:20 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Fri Sep 28, 11:25 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Sep 28, 11:41 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Fri Sep 28, 1:19 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Fri Sep 28, 1:22 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Mel Gorman
, (Fri Sep 28, 1:59 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Mel Gorman
, (Fri Sep 28, 2:05 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Mel Gorman
, (Fri Sep 28, 2:14 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 29, 1:13 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Sat Sep 29, 1:45 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Sat Sep 29, 1:47 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Sat Sep 29, 1:53 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 29, 2:00 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 29, 2:01 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Sat Sep 29, 2:14 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 29, 2:27 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Sat Sep 29, 12:09 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 29, 12:20 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Sat Sep 29, 9:16 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Sun Sep 30, 1:12 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Oct 1, 1:50 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Oct 1, 1:55 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Oct 1, 2:01 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Oct 1, 2:10 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon Oct 1, 2:30 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Oct 1, 2:38 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon Oct 1, 2:45 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Oct 1, 2:52 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Tue Oct 2, 1:37 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Tue Oct 2, 1:43 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Tue Oct 2, 2:19 am)
SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu Oct 4, 9:16 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Oct 4, 10:38 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Oct 4, 10:49 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Thu Oct 4, 10:50 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Oct 4, 10:58 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Thu Oct 4, 11:26 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu Oct 4, 11:32 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Oct 4, 12:05 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu Oct 4, 12:28 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Siddha, Suresh B
, (Thu Oct 4, 12:46 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Miller
, (Thu Oct 4, 1:48 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Miller
, (Thu Oct 4, 1:55 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu Oct 4, 1:58 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Thu Oct 4, 2:02 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu Oct 4, 2:05 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Miller
, (Thu Oct 4, 2:05 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Miller
, (Thu Oct 4, 2:11 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Oct 4, 2:11 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Thu Oct 4, 2:47 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Miller
, (Thu Oct 4, 3:07 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Chinner
, (Thu Oct 4, 3:23 pm)
RE: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Schwartz
, (Thu Oct 4, 4:39 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Thu Oct 4, 4:49 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Oct 4, 7:43 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Thu Oct 4, 7:53 pm)
RE: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Schwartz
, (Thu Oct 4, 9:18 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Jens Axboe
, (Thu Oct 4, 11:48 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Pekka Enberg
, (Fri Oct 5, 2:19 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Jens Axboe
, (Fri Oct 5, 2:28 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Andi Kleen
, (Fri Oct 5, 4:12 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri Oct 5, 4:56 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Jens Axboe
, (Fri Oct 5, 5:37 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Jens Axboe
, (Fri Oct 5, 5:39 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Oct 5, 12:27 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Oct 5, 12:31 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Oct 5, 12:32 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Fri Oct 5, 1:32 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Miller
, (Fri Oct 5, 2:31 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Ingo Molnar
Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
Vivek Goyal
[PATCH] x86_64: Display more intutive error message if kernel is not 2MB aligned
Andi Kleen
[PATCH] [0/35] Some x86 2.6.22 candidate patches for review
Andrew Morton
Re: [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE 2/2
Peter Zijlstra
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Marker probes in futex.c
git
:
Felipe Contreras
Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins
Johannes Schindelin
[PATCH] fetch: refuse to fetch into the current branch in a non-bare repository
Johannes Schindelin
Re: [PATCH] Fix install-doc-quick target
Peter Oberndorfer
Subject: [PATCH] fix stg edit command
Nicolas Pitre
Re: About git and the use of SHA-1
linux-netdev
:
Ursula Braun
[patch 2/8] [PATCH] af_iucv: sync sk shutdown flag if iucv path is quiesced
David Dillow
Re: [PATCH 2.6.30-rc4] r8169: avoid losing MSI interrupts
Andi Kleen
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning
Paul E. McKenney
Re: [PATCH 1/3] rcu: Introduce hlist_nulls variant of hlist
Russell King
Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
sh: Fix compile error by operands(mov.l) in sh3/entry.S
Linux Kernel Mailing List
New device ID for sc92031 [1088:2031]
Linux Kernel Mailing List
e1000e: Expose MDI-X status via ethtool change
Linux Kernel Mailing List
powerpc/kexec: Add support for FSL-BookE
Linux Kernel Mailing List
drivers/acpi: use kasprintf
openbsd-misc
:
Andres Salazar
About priorities in /etc/resolv.conf
Rob Shepherd
x86 hardware for router system
Henning Brauer
Re: Sun Blade 1000?
Mitja Muženič
Re: isakmpd -- NCP IPsec client: peer proposed invalid phase 2 IDs
Damien Miller
Re: Patching a SSH 'Weakness'
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate