Re: Decreasing stime running confuses top

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@...>, Willy Tarreau <w@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...>, Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@...>
Date: Thursday, October 4, 2007 - 3:32 pm

On 10/04/2007 03:19 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:

Is CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING set?

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
top displaying 9999% CPU usage, Frans Pop, (Wed Oct 3, 8:33 am)
Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage, Alexander E. Patrakov, (Wed Oct 3, 9:03 am)
Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage, Frans Pop, (Wed Oct 3, 10:04 am)
Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage, Ilpo Järvinen, (Wed Oct 3, 10:43 am)
Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage, Ilpo Järvinen, (Wed Oct 3, 10:51 am)
Re: Decreasing stime running confuses top, Chuck Ebbert, (Thu Oct 4, 3:32 pm)
Re: Decreasing stime running confuses top, Christian Borntraeger, (Thu Oct 4, 4:00 pm)
Re: Decreasing stime running confuses top, Chuck Ebbert, (Thu Oct 4, 4:21 pm)
[PATCH for testing] Re: Decreasing stime running confuses top, Christian Borntraeger, (Thu Oct 4, 5:10 pm)
Re: [PATCH for testing] Re: Decreasing stime running confuse..., Christian Borntraeger, (Mon Oct 8, 12:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH for testing] Re: Decreasing stime running confuse..., Christian Borntraeger, (Thu Oct 4, 6:31 pm)
Re: top displaying 9999% CPU usage, Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Oct 3, 8:52 am)