On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 07:53:16PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > The only vendor that ever implemented OOSTOREs was Centaur, and they > > only did in the Winchip generation of the CPUs. When they dropped it > > from the C3, I asked whether they intended to bring it back, and the > > answer was "extremely unlikely". > > > > Do you know if it made a big performance difference? On the winchip, it was a huge win. I can't remember exact numbers, but pretty much every benchmark I threw at it at the time showed significant improvement. > But yes we should probably just remove this special case to make > maintenance easier. It's CONFIG_SMP anyway, which none of the winchips were. SMP+OOSTORE just didn't happen, and I'd be surprised if any vendor makes it happen any time soon. (Even if so, it's likely we'd need to make additional changes anyway, so adding it back shouldn't be a big deal.) Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Eric Paris | [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
