login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
October
»
4
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Christoph Lameter
Subject:
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
Date: Thursday, October 4, 2007 - 10:58 am
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
quoted text
> Ok every time something says anything not 100% positive about SLUB you > come back with "but it's fixed in the next patch set"... *every time*.
All I ask that people test the fixes that have been out there for the known issues. If there are remaining performance issues then lets figure them out and address them. -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Tue Sep 18, 8:36 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Thu Sep 27, 2:42 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Thu Sep 27, 10:14 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Sep 28, 10:33 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Fri Sep 28, 10:55 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Sep 28, 11:20 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Fri Sep 28, 11:25 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Sep 28, 11:41 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Fri Sep 28, 1:19 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Fri Sep 28, 1:22 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Mel Gorman
, (Fri Sep 28, 1:59 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Mel Gorman
, (Fri Sep 28, 2:05 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Mel Gorman
, (Fri Sep 28, 2:14 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 29, 1:13 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Sat Sep 29, 1:45 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Sat Sep 29, 1:47 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Sat Sep 29, 1:53 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 29, 2:00 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 29, 2:01 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Sat Sep 29, 2:14 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 29, 2:27 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Sat Sep 29, 12:09 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 29, 12:20 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Sat Sep 29, 9:16 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Sun Sep 30, 1:12 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Oct 1, 1:50 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Oct 1, 1:55 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Oct 1, 2:01 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Oct 1, 2:10 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon Oct 1, 2:30 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Oct 1, 2:38 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon Oct 1, 2:45 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Oct 1, 2:52 pm)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Tue Oct 2, 1:37 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Nick Piggin
, (Tue Oct 2, 1:43 am)
Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Tue Oct 2, 2:19 am)
SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu Oct 4, 9:16 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Oct 4, 10:38 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Oct 4, 10:49 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Thu Oct 4, 10:50 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Oct 4, 10:58 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Thu Oct 4, 11:26 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu Oct 4, 11:32 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Oct 4, 12:05 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu Oct 4, 12:28 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Siddha, Suresh B
, (Thu Oct 4, 12:46 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Miller
, (Thu Oct 4, 1:48 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Miller
, (Thu Oct 4, 1:55 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu Oct 4, 1:58 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Thu Oct 4, 2:02 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu Oct 4, 2:05 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Miller
, (Thu Oct 4, 2:05 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Miller
, (Thu Oct 4, 2:11 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Oct 4, 2:11 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Thu Oct 4, 2:47 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Miller
, (Thu Oct 4, 3:07 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Chinner
, (Thu Oct 4, 3:23 pm)
RE: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Schwartz
, (Thu Oct 4, 4:39 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Thu Oct 4, 4:49 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Thu Oct 4, 7:43 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Thu Oct 4, 7:53 pm)
RE: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Schwartz
, (Thu Oct 4, 9:18 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Jens Axboe
, (Thu Oct 4, 11:48 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Pekka Enberg
, (Fri Oct 5, 2:19 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Jens Axboe
, (Fri Oct 5, 2:28 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Andi Kleen
, (Fri Oct 5, 4:12 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri Oct 5, 4:56 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Jens Axboe
, (Fri Oct 5, 5:37 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Jens Axboe
, (Fri Oct 5, 5:39 am)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Oct 5, 12:27 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Oct 5, 12:31 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Christoph Lameter
, (Fri Oct 5, 12:32 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Fri Oct 5, 1:32 pm)
Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
, David Miller
, (Fri Oct 5, 2:31 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
FUJITA Tomonori
Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Uwe Kleine-König
Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: allow, but warn, when issuing ioremap() on RAM
Ingo Molnar
Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] sched: automated per tty task groups
Andrew Morton
Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce hardware spinlock framework
Rafael J. Wysocki
[Bug #15669] INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
libata: disable ATAPI AN by default
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ARM: 5905/1: ARM: Global ASID allocation on SMP
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Disallow gcc versions 4.1.{0,1}
Linux Kernel Mailing List
timer: Try to survive timer callback preempt_count leak
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Documentation/timers/hpet_example.c: only build on X86
linux-netdev
:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Re: [PATCH 06/37] dccp: Limit feature negotiation to connection setup phase
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 1/5] dccp: Initialisation framework for feature negotiation
Daniel Lezcano
getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change
David Miller
Re: 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" trying to ifenslave a seco...
Badalian Vyacheslav
Re: tc filter flow hash question
git
:
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH] Detached HEAD (experimental)
Stefan Richter
Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins
A Large Angry SCM
Re: [RFC] origin link for cherry-pick and revert
Petr Baudis
Re: PPC SHA-1 Updates in "pu"
Mike Miller
git message
linux-ath5k-devel
:
Lucio Torre
[ath5k-devel] ath5k problems on lenovo x200
Soeren Sonnenburg
Re: [ath5k-devel] ath5k_pci: gain calibration timeout / unable to reset hardware -11
Bob Copeland
Re: [ath5k-devel] Send packet from inside ath5k_intr() or ath5k_tasklet_rx()
Nick Kossifidis
Re: [ath5k-devel] madwifi HAL register dumps
Joerg Pommnitz
Re: [ath5k-devel] ath5k phy0: failed to warm reset the MAC Chip
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate
