Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 - 11:59 am

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Paul Jackson wrote:


Make both policy and the mode char? Could we shorten the mpol_nodemask_mode 
to mode?


Hmmm... I would rather have numactl manage this flag and specify it in 
calls to set memory policies.

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Paul Jackson, (Tue Oct 30, 11:17 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 31, 11:59 am)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 31, 2:05 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Oct 31, 10:25 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Paul Jackson, (Wed Oct 31, 11:33 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, David Rientjes, (Thu Nov 1, 1:03 am)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 6:07 am)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 10:07 am)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Lee Schermerhorn, (Thu Nov 1, 10:38 am)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Nov 1, 10:44 am)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, David Rientjes, (Thu Nov 1, 11:52 am)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, David Rientjes, (Thu Nov 1, 12:00 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, David Rientjes, (Thu Nov 1, 12:03 pm)
Re: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice, David Rientjes, (Thu Nov 1, 12:06 pm)