Re: kernel processes - are they really needed?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Matthias Kaehlcke
Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 - 10:10 am

El Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 05:01:42PM +0100 Jan Kara ha dit:
 

i'll also put my 0.5 cents :)


executes (on CPU 0) the deferred parts of interrupt routines (bottom
halves), i.e. softirqs and tasklets. bad candidate for removal imo


this one is in charge of executing deferred functions placed in the
default work queue. also a bad candidate for removal


-- 
Matthias Kaehlcke
Linux Application Developer
Barcelona

                If you don't know where you are going,
               you will probably end up somewhere else
                         (Laurence J. Peter)
                                                                 .''`.
    using free software / Debian GNU/Linux | http://debian.org  : :'  :
                                                                `. `'`
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 47D8E5D4                  `-
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
kernel processes - are they really needed?, Ram, (Wed Oct 24, 6:37 am)
Re: kernel processes - are they really needed?, linux-os (Dick Johnson), (Wed Oct 24, 8:30 am)
Re: kernel processes - are they really needed?, Andi Kleen, (Wed Oct 24, 12:43 pm)
Re: kernel processes - are they really needed?, Jan Kara, (Wed Oct 31, 9:01 am)
Re: kernel processes - are they really needed?, Dmitry Torokhov, (Wed Oct 31, 9:35 am)
Re: kernel processes - are they really needed?, Matthias Kaehlcke, (Wed Oct 31, 10:10 am)
Re: kernel processes - are they really needed?, Andi Kleen, (Wed Oct 31, 10:33 am)
Re: kernel processes - are they really needed?, Dmitry Torokhov, (Thu Nov 1, 6:51 pm)