Jeff Garzik wrote:
quoted text
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Right, that's of course problematic... There has to be a way to recover
>> that situation though, or you can't export any user command issue
>> facility.
> 
> You cannot hope to handle all possible effects arising from an app 
> providing an invalid sg header / cdb.

Is it "invalid" though? As a SCSI command, it seems perfectly valid to 
ask for less data than the total amount the drive could possibly send.

It's only when we have to translate it to an ATA command in libata that 
it becomes invalid there, right?

Are you saying that we should limit the SG_IO commands to only ones that 
are valid both as SCSI *and* as their ATA translations? Would that be 
for all SCSI devices, or just ones that libata backs?

Daniel
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/