On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 22:25 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
quoted text
> On Wednesday 31 October 2007 23:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 21:46 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
>=20
> > > And I'd prevent these ones from doing so.
> > >
> > > Without keeping track of "reserve" pages, which doesn't feel
> > > too clean.
> >
> > The problem with that is that once a slab was allocated with the right
> > allocation context, anybody can get objects from these slabs.
>=20
> [snip]
>=20
> I understand that.
>=20
>=20
> > So we either reserve a page per object, which for 32 byte objects is a
> > large waste, or we stop anybody who doesn't have the right permissions
> > from obtaining objects. I took the latter approach.
>=20
> What I'm saying is that the slab allocator slowpath should always
> just check watermarks against the current task. Instead of this
> ->reserve stuff.

So what you say is to allocate a slab every time we take the slow path,
even when we already have one?

That sounds rather sub-optimal.