Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
quoted text > Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Which seems rather unnatural to me. All other merge architectures have
>> ARCH=<archdir> where archdir is the name under arch, e.g. mips, powerpc,
>> s390. They then have a CONFIG_FOO_64 and set the utsname and -m32/-m64
>> respectively. It would be nice if x86 could behave like all other
>> architectures in this respect. Especially as the behaviour of the other
>> architectures is a lot more intuitive.
>>
>
> Yes, that would be nice. I keep forgetting the ARCH= in my crossbuild
> trees, and end up with strange mismashes.
>
That, however, is a bigger problem that also affects, for example,
compiling for MIPS on an x86 host. I believe Sam is working on a
solution for that.
(That doesn't mean that is not the right thing to do.)
-hpa
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: 32bit builds on x86-64 host. , H. Peter Anvin , (Tue Oct 30, 9:11 pm)