Re: [patch 08/10] SLUB: Optional fast path using cmpxchg_local

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>
Cc: <matthew@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>, <penberg@...>, <linux-arch@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 2:49 pm

On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:32:04 -0700
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:


Let's cc linux-arch: presumably other architectures can implement cpu-local
cmpxchg and would see some benefit from doing so.

The semantics are "atomic wrt interrutps on this cpu, not atomic wrt other
cpus", yes?

Do you have a feel for how useful it would be for arch maintainers to implement
this?  IOW, is it worth their time?

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 08/10] SLUB: Optional fast path using cmpxchg_local, Christoph Lameter, (Sat Oct 27, 11:32 pm)
Re: [patch 08/10] SLUB: Optional fast path using cmpxchg_local, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Oct 30, 10:28 pm)
Re: [patch 08/10] SLUB: Optional fast path using cmpxchg_local, Andrew Morton, (Tue Oct 30, 2:49 pm)
Re: [patch 08/10] SLUB: Optional fast path using cmpxchg_local, Christoph Lameter, (Tue Oct 30, 2:58 pm)
[PATCH] local_t Documentation update 2, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Oct 30, 9:52 pm)
Re: [patch 08/10] SLUB: Optional fast path using cmpxchg_local, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Oct 30, 3:12 pm)
Re: [patch 08/10] SLUB: Optional fast path using cmpxchg_local, Christoph Lameter, (Sun Oct 28, 11:34 pm)
Re: [patch 08/10] SLUB: Optional fast path using cmpxchg_local, Christoph Lameter, (Sun Oct 28, 10:59 pm)