On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 13:24 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:I think I'm with jgarzik on this, lets not do this until its clear where the generalized instrumentation goes to. That is, i386/x86_64 -> x86 was part of a full integration plan, one that was immediately followed up by a series of integration patches. With this, I see no such plan. Please draft this generic instrumentation you talk about, if after that we all like it, we can go moving files together with the immediate purpose of integrating them. -
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Adrian Bunk | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 26/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 1 (socket set... |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
