On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

quoted text
> 
> 
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > 
> > The other possible workaround would be to avoid using MMCONFIG
> > until the BAR sizing is done. 
> 
> The only sane solution is the one that people constantly seem to
> ignore:
> 
>  - only use MMCONFIG if absolutely required by the access itself
> 
> In other words, make the MMCONFIG code fall back on old-style
> accesses for any register access to a word with reg+size <= 256.

the problem is... you're not supposed to mix both types of accesses.
 
quoted text
> At that point, almost all the issues with mmconfig just go away,
> BECAUSE NOBODY USES IT, so it doesn't matter if it's broken?
> 
> The fact is, CONF1 style accesses are just safer, and *work*. 

I would suggest a slight twist then: use CONF1 *until* you're using
something above 256, and then and only then switch to MMCONFIG from
then on for all accesses.

That should solve the spec issue (yes I know about specs, but this is
one of those things that will bite us in the future if we're not
careful)

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/