On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 03:06:20PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
quoted text
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >Hello!
> >
> >While reviewing rcu_dereference() uses, I came across a number of cases
> >where I couldn't see how the rcu_dereference() helped.  One class of
> >cases is where the variable is never subsequently dereferenced, so that
> >patches like the following one would be appropriate.
> >
> >So, what am I missing here?
> 
> Nothing, it was mainly intended as documentation that the hooks are
> protected by RCU. I agree that its probably more confusing this way
> since we're not even in a rcu_read_lock protected section.
> 
> I've queued a patch to remove them all.

Thank you!!!

						Thanx, Paul
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/