Re: 32bit builds on x86-64 host.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 9:10 am

On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 05:07:08PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

Which seems rather unnatural to me.  All other merge architectures have
ARCH=<archdir> where archdir is the name under arch, e.g. mips, powerpc,
s390.  They then have a CONFIG_FOO_64 and set the utsname and -m32/-m64
respectively.  It would be nice if x86 could behave like all other
architectures in this respect.  Especially as the behaviour of the other
architectures is a lot more intuitive.

---end quoted text---
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
32bit builds on x86-64 host., Dave Jones, (Mon Oct 29, 7:32 pm)
Re: 32bit builds on x86-64 host., H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Oct 29, 8:07 pm)
Re: 32bit builds on x86-64 host., Christoph Hellwig, (Tue Oct 30, 9:10 am)
Re: 32bit builds on x86-64 host., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Oct 30, 9:00 pm)
Re: 32bit builds on x86-64 host., Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Oct 31, 4:57 am)
Re: 32bit builds on x86-64 host., Sam Ravnborg, (Wed Oct 31, 5:41 am)
Re: 32bit builds on x86-64 host., H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Oct 30, 9:11 pm)
Re: 32bit builds on x86-64 host., Dave Jones, (Mon Oct 29, 8:39 pm)
Re: 32bit builds on x86-64 host., Al Viro, (Mon Oct 29, 8:06 pm)