Rusty Russell wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 10:37 +0100, Chris Malley wrote:
>> Hi guys
>>
>> Would it not be clearer to #include <asm/bootparam.h> and use 
>> the relevant named members of struct setup_header / struct boot_params
>> rather than the hard-coded values 0x202, 0x1F1, 0x214 ?
> 
> Yes, but unfortunately bootparam.h wasn't designed to be included from
> userspace.
> 
> The patch would look like this, but it makes me wonder if it'd be better
> to put all these user-exposed types in bootparam.h and have the other
> headers include them.  hpa?
> 

I don't have a strong preference either way, but I think what you have 
here is fine.

	-hpa

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/