On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:In fact, I think this is it! The load average is not calculated every tick, because that's not just expensive, but we also want to have some time-based decay. So it's calculated every LOAD_FREQ ticks. And guess what: LOAD_FREQ is defined to be exactly five seconds. So imagine if the timer gets to be in sync with another event that happens every five seconds - let's pick at random a 5-second JBD transaction thing? Anders - does this idiotic patch make a difference for you? Without this, I can easily imagine that the rounding code tends to try to round to an even second, and the load-average code generally also runs at even seconds! Linus --- include/linux/sched.h | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index a01ac6d..643de0f 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ extern unsigned long avenrun[]; /* Load averages */ #define FSHIFT 11 /* nr of bits of precision */ #define FIXED_1 (1<<FSHIFT) /* 1.0 as fixed-point */ -#define LOAD_FREQ (5*HZ) /* 5 sec intervals */ +#define LOAD_FREQ (5*HZ+1) /* ~5 sec intervals */ #define EXP_1 1884 /* 1/exp(5sec/1min) as fixed-point */ #define EXP_5 2014 /* 1/exp(5sec/5min) */ #define EXP_15 2037 /* 1/exp(5sec/15min) */ -
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | Re: Linux 2.6.27-rc5: System boot regression caused by commit a2bd7274b47124d2fc4d... |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
