Re: [Question] How to represent SYSTEM_RAM in kerenel/resouce.c

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Wednesday, October 3, 2007 - 9:43 am

On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:37:13AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:

Rubbish.  iomem is a representation of the physical addresses in the
system as seen from the CPU's perspective.  As I said in my previous
mail in this thread, if you attempt to map a device's BAR over the top
of physical RAM, things will go poorly for you.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Question] How to represent SYSTEM_RAM in kerenel/resouce.c, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Oct 2, 6:31 pm)
Re: [Question] How to represent SYSTEM_RAM in kerenel/reso ..., Matthew Wilcox, (Wed Oct 3, 9:43 am)
[PATCH] Add IORESOUCE_BUSY flag for System RAM take 2. , Yasunori Goto, (Mon Nov 5, 7:23 pm)