* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

quoted text
> Your compiler generates
> 
> 	movl    -16(%ebp),%edx
> 	movl    (%edx),%edi		/* this is _totally_ bogus! */
> 	incl    %edx
> 	movl    %edx,-16(%ebp)
> 	movl    %edi,%ecx
> 	testb   %cl,%cl
> 	je      ...

ah, ok.

quoted text
> while I get (gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-28)):
> 
>         movl    -16(%ebp), %eax # p,
>         movzbl  (%eax), %edi    #, c	/* not bogus! */
>         movl    %edi, %edx      # c,
>         testb   %dl, %dl        #
>         je      .L64    #,
>         incl    %eax    #
>         movsbl  %dl,%ebx        #, D.12414
>         movl    %eax, -16(%ebp) #, p
> 
> where the difference (apart from doing the increment differently and 
> different register allocation) is that I have a "movzbl" (correct), 
> while you have a "movl" (pure and utter crap).

i'll try with another compiler in a minute.

	Ingo
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/