On Wednesday 03 October 2007, you wrote:Thanks for the suggestion. PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 5269 fjp 20 0 442m 61m 33m S 9999 3.1 0:34.12 kontact Here are the last two reads for PID 5269 from /proc before that: 15:48:51 stat("/proc/5269", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0555, st_size=0, ...}) = 0 15:48:51 open("/proc/5269/stat", O_RDONLY) = 10 15:48:51 read(10, "5269 (kontact) S 1 5100 5100 0 -1 4202560 58186 7891 290 1 2911 502 10 15 20 0 6 0 9225 464408576 15694 18446744073709551615 4194304 4365900 140733817144688 18446744073709551615 47998530367074 0 0 4098 83113 18446744073709551615 0 0 17 1 0 0 0\n", 1023) = 244 15:48:51 open("/proc/5269/statm", O_RDONLY) = 10 15:48:54 stat("/proc/5269", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0555, st_size=0, ...}) = 0 15:48:54 open("/proc/5269/stat", O_RDONLY) = 10 15:48:54 read(10, "5269 (kontact) S 1 5100 5100 0 -1 4202560 58186 7891 290 1 2912 500 10 15 20 0 6 0 9225 464408576 15694 18446744073709551615 4194304 4365900 140733817144688 18446744073709551615 47998530367074 0 0 4098 83113 18446744073709551615 0 0 17 1 0 0 0\n", 1023) = 244 15:48:54 open("/proc/5269/statm", O_RDONLY) = 10 The only change is in 2 consecutive columns: "2911 502" -> "2912 500". Is processor usage calculated from those? Can someone explain how? In reply to Jan Engelhardt: If I run the endless loop, top just displays 100%. I've not seen the 9999 in htop, only occasionally "100." for both. This is on an x86_64 SMP box. -
| Jeff Chua | 2.6.27rc1 cannot boot more than 8CPUs |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Winkler, Tomas | RE: iwlwifi: fix build bug in "iwlwifi: fix LED stall" |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Andrew Dickinson | tx queue hashing hot-spots and poor performance (multiq, ixgbe) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
