Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » October » 3

I have a problem with signal mask

Previous thread: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag fixes by Paul Jackson on Wednesday, October 3, 2007 - 4:44 am. (7 messages)

Next thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal(i386): alternative signal stack wraparound occurs by Mikael Pettersson on Wednesday, October 3, 2007 - 5:20 am. (4 messages)
[view original message]
From: Giana
Subject: I have a problem with signal mask
Date: Wednesday, October 3, 2007 - 5:16 am

Hello,

I have done Streams multiplexers in Linux kernel. Created two multiplexers
and I could open these 2, close the file descriptors of each and could
link/unlink one with another properly .

But after linking, if i close the descriptor of the linked one: my signals
are unblocked automatically....

Scenario: 
1. Created 2 Multiplexers. Link B under A.
2. Now I set SIG_BLOCK to my current running process.
3. Close file descriptor of B
4. Now the signals are received by the process, It automatically goes for
UN_BLOCK
5. But I want the SIG_BLOCK state should be continued in this case....

Only in this scenario, it happens. All other scenarios like (Unlink without
close fd / close fd with out link) works fine....

Please give me some suggestion on this....

Thanks & Regards,
Giana


-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/I-have-a-problem-with-signal-mask-tf4561448.html#a13017702
Sent from the linux-kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-


[ message continues ]
Previous thread: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag fixes by Paul Jackson on Wednesday, October 3, 2007 - 4:44 am. (7 messages)

Next thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal(i386): alternative signal stack wraparound occurs by Mikael Pettersson on Wednesday, October 3, 2007 - 5:20 am. (4 messages)