Hi guys Would it not be clearer to #include <asm/bootparam.h> and use the relevant named members of struct setup_header / struct boot_params rather than the hard-coded values 0x202, 0x1F1, 0x214 ? -- Chris On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 09:40 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: [snip]-
| Junio C Hamano | [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.6.0 |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [ANNOUNCE] mdb: Merkey's Linux Kernel Debugger 2.6.27-rc4 released |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Paul Menage | Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] Account for the number of tasks within container |
git: | |
| Nicolas Pitre | Re: pack operation is thrashing my server |
| Scott Chacon | Git Community Book |
| Greg KH | Re: [ANNOUNCE] pg - A patch porcelain for GIT |
| Lars Hjemli | [PATCH] git-merge: add option --no-ff |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Nick Guenther | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Travers Buda | Re: Important OpenBSD errata |
| Gregory Edigarov | How to re-build openssl with SHA1 support? |
| Al Boldi | [RFC] VM: I have a dream... |
| Dave Kleikamp | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Jörn | Review status (Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three) |
| Chris Mason | [ANNOUNCE] Btrfs v0.12 released |
