On 02-10-2007 17:37, David Schwartz wrote:
...
quoted text > So now I not only have to come up with an example where sched_yield is the
> best practical choice, I have to come up with one where sched_yield is the
> best conceivable choice? Didn't we start out by agreeing these are very rare
> cases? Why are we designing new APIs for them (Arjan) and why do we care
> about their performance (Ingo)?
>
> These are *rare* cases. It is a waste of time to optimize them.
Probably we'll start to care after first comparison tests done by our
rivals. It should be a piece of cake for them to find the "right"
code...
Regards,
Jarek P.
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: Network slowdown due to CFS , Jarek Poplawski , (Wed Oct 3, 3:15 am)
Re: yield , Jarek Poplawski , (Wed Oct 3, 8:16 am)