On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 21:41 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text
> * Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > > -	return clock_t_to_cputime(utime);
> > > +	p->prev_utime = max(p->prev_utime, clock_t_to_cputime(utime));
> > > +	return p->prev_utime;
> > >  }
> > [...]
> > 
> > I dont think it will work. It will make utime monotic, but stime can 
> > still decrease. For example let sum_exec_runtime increase by a tiny 
> > little bit while utime will get a full additional tick. stime is 
> > sum-utime. So stime can still go backwards. So I think that we need 
> > this kind of logic for stime as well, no?
> 
> yeah, probably. Peter?

/me dons the brown paper bag while mumbling an agreement of sorts.

I'll not attempt to come up with a patch as I fear I'll just make a
bigger mess in my current state, hope to feel better tomorrow..

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/