* Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:

quoted text
> > -	return clock_t_to_cputime(utime);
> > +	p->prev_utime = max(p->prev_utime, clock_t_to_cputime(utime));
> > +	return p->prev_utime;
> >  }
> [...]
> 
> I dont think it will work. It will make utime monotic, but stime can 
> still decrease. For example let sum_exec_runtime increase by a tiny 
> little bit while utime will get a full additional tick. stime is 
> sum-utime. So stime can still go backwards. So I think that we need 
> this kind of logic for stime as well, no?

yeah, probably. Peter?

	Ingo
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/