Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » October » 29

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 1/2] usb_gigaset: suspend support

Previous thread: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) by Rob Meijer on Monday, October 29, 2007 - 3:04 pm. (37 messages)

Next thread: [PATCH 1/2] netdrvr/ibmlana: modularization cleanup by Jeff Garzik on Monday, October 29, 2007 - 3:33 pm. (4 messages)
[view original message]
From: Alan Stern <stern@...>
To: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Greg KH <gregkh@...>, <linux-usb-devel@...>, Hansjoerg Lipp <hjlipp@...>, Karsten Keil <kkeil@...>, <i4ldeveloper@...>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 1/2] usb_gigaset: suspend support
Date: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 3:10 pm

Does this really compile?  The .pre_reset and .suspend members are

pointers to functions with different prototypes; I don't see how you

can assign the same function to both pointers.


Alan Stern


-
[view original message]
From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Greg KH <gregkh@...>, <linux-usb-devel@...>, Hansjoerg Lipp <hjlipp@...>, Karsten Keil <kkeil@...>, <i4ldeveloper@...>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 1/2] usb_gigaset: suspend support
Date: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 5:20 pm

Oops, you're right. Yes, it does compile, but with a warning

"initialization from incompatible pointer type" which I

foolishly ignored.


I'll produce a corrected version promptly.


Thanks,

Tilman


--=20

Tilman Schmidt                          E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc

Bonn, Germany

Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.

Unge=F6ffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe R=FCckseite)
Previous thread: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) by Rob Meijer on Monday, October 29, 2007 - 3:04 pm. (37 messages)

Next thread: [PATCH 1/2] netdrvr/ibmlana: modularization cleanup by Jeff Garzik on Monday, October 29, 2007 - 3:33 pm. (4 messages)