On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 12:07 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
quoted text
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > This still doesn't solve the fundamental corruption problem:
> > sdev->event_work has to contain the work entry until the workqueue has
> > finished executing it (which is some unspecified time in the future).
> > As soon as you drop the sdev->list_lock, the system thinks
> > sdev->event_work is available for reuse.  If we fire another event
> > before the work queue finished processing the prior event, the queue
> > will be corrupted.
> 
> I think you're misunderstanding the workqueue code?  You can call 
> schedule_work(&sdev->event_work) from anywhere, any time you like, as 
> many times as you like.

OK, take me through it slowly then ... I think schedule_work(work)
inserts work->entry onto the workqueue list (in
workqueue.c:insert_work()).  If the event hasn't fired, it will already
be on the list, so adding the same entry to a list twice causes a list
corruption problem.

Plus, unfortunately, the CC/UA events are going to have to carry extra
sense data; they're not simply going to be triggers saying something
happened.

James


-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/