login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
October
»
29
Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Kumar Gala <galak@...>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <nfs@...>, <neilb@...>, <bfields@...>, <chuck.lever@...>
Subject:
Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT
Date: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 10:41 am
On Oct 26, 2007, at 4:42 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
quoted text
> > On Oct 25, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >> Could you please try the following patch? >> >> Cheers >> Trond >> --------------------------------- CUT HERE >> ----------------------------- >> From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> >> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:56:10 -0400 >> NFS: Fix the ustat() regression >> >> Since 2.6.18, the superblock sb->s_root has been a dummy dentry >> with a >> dummy inode. This breaks ustat(), which actually uses sb->s_root in a >> vfstat() call. >> >> Fix this by making the s_root a dummy alias to the directory inode >> that was >> used when creating the superblock. >> >> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> >> --- >> >> fs/nfs/getroot.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++ >> +------------------------------------ >> 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) > > Any reason not to send this to Linus as a bug fix for 2.6.24 (and > possibly stable)?
ping. would love to see this is Linus's tree. - k -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT
, Kumar Gala
, (Tue Oct 23, 6:52 pm)
Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT
, Trond Myklebust
, (Tue Oct 23, 9:21 pm)
Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT
, Kumar Gala
, (Wed Oct 24, 1:05 am)
Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT
, Kumar Gala
, (Thu Oct 25, 11:59 am)
Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT
, Trond Myklebust
, (Thu Oct 25, 1:59 pm)
Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT
, Kumar Gala
, (Fri Nov 2, 10:28 am)
Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT
, Kumar Gala
, (Thu Nov 8, 3:36 am)
Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT
, Kumar Gala
, (Fri Oct 26, 5:42 am)
Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT
, Kumar Gala
, (Mon Oct 29, 10:41 am)
Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT
, Kumar Gala
, (Thu Oct 25, 2:36 pm)
Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT
, Trond Myklebust
, (Thu Oct 25, 2:39 pm)
Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT
, Kumar Gala
, (Thu Oct 25, 3:05 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 008/196] Chinese: add translation of volatile-considered-harmful.txt
Amit K. Arora
[RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
Bart Van Assche
Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Linus Torvalds
Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
Natalie Protasevich
[BUG] New Kernel Bugs
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
477 guests
online.
Online users
tanggana93
Syndicate