Re: 2.6.23 regression: second access of empty ntfs file leads to D state hang

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 6:40 am

On 29 Oct 2007, at 06:18, Mike Galbraith wrote:


What makes you think it is members only?!?  NTFS-dev is not members  
only at all.  It is moderated which is a very different thing.  Most  
list members have to be approved for posting, too...  And the only  
reason it is moderated is spam filtering.  We delete 99.9% of emails  
going to the list by hand as moderators because they are all spam.   
That means the list and the list archives only contain NTFS related  
messages and not thousands of posts trying to sell you pills and what  
not...

Best regards,

	Anton


-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] 2.6.23 regression: second access of emp..., Anton Altaparmakov, (Mon Oct 29, 6:31 am)
Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] 2.6.23 regression: second access of emp..., Anton Altaparmakov, (Mon Oct 29, 9:39 am)
Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] 2.6.23 regression: second access of emp..., Anton Altaparmakov, (Tue Oct 30, 5:23 am)
Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] 2.6.23 regression: second access of emp..., Anton Altaparmakov, (Fri Nov 2, 3:22 pm)
Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] 2.6.23 regression: second access of emp..., Anton Altaparmakov, (Sat Nov 3, 3:27 am)
Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] 2.6.23 regression: second access of emp..., Anton Altaparmakov, (Mon Oct 29, 9:41 am)
Re: 2.6.23 regression: second access of empty ntfs file lead..., Anton Altaparmakov, (Mon Oct 29, 6:40 am)