Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » October » 29

Re: [patch 09/10] SLUB: Do our own locking via slab_lock and slab_unlock.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Pekka Enberg
Subject: Re: [patch 09/10] SLUB: Do our own locking via slab_lock and slab_unlock.
Date: Sunday, October 28, 2007 - 11:30 pm

Hi,

On 10/29/07, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:

Disabled? But yeah, I see that slab_trylock() can leave preemption
disabled if cmpxchg fails. Was confused by the #ifdefs... :-)
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[patch 09/10] SLUB: Do our own locking via slab_lock and s ..., Christoph Lameter, (Sat Oct 27, 8:32 pm)
Re: [patch 09/10] SLUB: Do our own locking via slab_lock a ..., Pekka J Enberg, (Sun Oct 28, 8:10 am)
Re: [patch 09/10] SLUB: Do our own locking via slab_lock a ..., Pekka J Enberg, (Sun Oct 28, 8:14 am)
Re: [patch 09/10] SLUB: Do our own locking via slab_lock a ..., Christoph Lameter, (Sun Oct 28, 8:03 pm)
Re: [patch 09/10] SLUB: Do our own locking via slab_lock a ..., Pekka Enberg, (Sun Oct 28, 11:30 pm)
Re: [patch 09/10] SLUB: Do our own locking via slab_lock a ..., Nick Piggin, (Mon Oct 29, 9:50 pm)
Re: [patch 09/10] SLUB: Do our own locking via slab_lock a ..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Oct 30, 11:32 am)
Re: [patch 09/10] SLUB: Do our own locking via slab_lock a ..., Nick Piggin, (Tue Oct 30, 6:17 pm)