On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:27:27 -0400 "Barak Fargoun" <barak@neocleus.com> wrote:I appreciate that Xen is about 2 years behind the curve and only uses 2.6.18, but what do you expect us on this list to do with this patch? 2.6.18 is no longer maintained: it doesn't get -stable updates anymore. (And if it did, I doubt this kind of change would be suitable for a -stable release anyway)... so the first step really is to make a patch against 2.6.24-rc or a later git version.... because then and only then is your patch something that anyone else here can DO something with ... (it's like the tree in the forest... if a tree falls in a forest, but everyone moved to a different forest 2 years ago, does it make a sound?) Greetings, Arjan van de Ven -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Yinghai Lu | Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: check for and defend against BIOS memory corruption |
| Frederik Deweerdt | [-mm patch] remove tcp header from tcp_v4_check (take #2) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Herbert Xu | Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching |
git: | |
