login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
October
»
28
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Tilman Schmidt
Subject:
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework
Date: Sunday, October 28, 2007 - 12:42 pm
Am 27.10.2007 20:22 schrieb Pavel Machek:
quoted text
> Hi! >=20 >> but require unreasonable interface changes. As people who care >> about security (y'all who are only from the LKML are excused) it >> is our obligation to look beyond the preconceived notions of what >> is and isn't secure. Security is subjective. It's how you feel >> about it. >=20 > <sarcasm>Hmm. So lets add automagic security module. It magically fixes=
quoted text
> security holes, and you can feel good about it.</sarcasm>
Send patch. --=20 Tilman Schmidt E-Mail:
tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Unge=F6ffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe R=FCckseite)
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, Linus Torvalds
, (Wed Oct 17, 7:18 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Fri Oct 19, 1:26 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, Linus Torvalds
, (Fri Oct 19, 1:40 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, James Morris
, (Fri Oct 19, 2:07 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Sat Oct 20, 4:05 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, James Morris
, (Sat Oct 20, 3:57 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, Adrian Bunk
, (Sun Oct 21, 3:59 pm)
Re: Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, Crispin Cowan
, (Sun Oct 21, 6:12 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Mon Oct 22, 9:09 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
, James Morris
, (Mon Oct 22, 9:56 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Mon Oct 22, 9:57 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
, Chris Wright
, (Mon Oct 22, 10:16 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, Giacomo Catenazzi
, (Mon Oct 22, 10:44 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Tue Oct 23, 1:55 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Tue Oct 23, 2:10 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
, Chris Wright
, (Tue Oct 23, 2:13 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Tue Oct 23, 2:13 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Tue Oct 23, 2:14 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, Giacomo A. Catenazzi
, (Tue Oct 23, 2:14 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Tue Oct 23, 2:18 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, Serge E. Hallyn
, (Tue Oct 23, 8:20 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Tue Oct 23, 8:28 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, Serge E. Hallyn
, (Tue Oct 23, 8:34 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Tue Oct 23, 5:31 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
, Chris Wright
, (Tue Oct 23, 5:32 pm)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Tue Oct 23, 10:06 pm)
Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Wed Oct 24, 4:50 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Adrian Bunk
, (Wed Oct 24, 5:55 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Wed Oct 24, 11:11 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Wed Oct 24, 11:51 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Wed Oct 24, 11:59 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Wed Oct 24, 12:04 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Crispin Cowan
, (Wed Oct 24, 1:18 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Wed Oct 24, 1:46 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, David P. Quigley
, (Wed Oct 24, 2:02 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Casey Schaufler
, (Wed Oct 24, 2:29 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Serge E. Hallyn
, (Wed Oct 24, 2:37 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Wed Oct 24, 2:42 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Wed Oct 24, 2:51 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Casey Schaufler
, (Wed Oct 24, 2:58 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, David P. Quigley
, (Wed Oct 24, 3:02 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, David P. Quigley
, (Wed Oct 24, 3:04 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Adrian Bunk
, (Wed Oct 24, 3:31 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Casey Schaufler
, (Wed Oct 24, 3:58 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Wed Oct 24, 4:13 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Adrian Bunk
, (Wed Oct 24, 4:32 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Wed Oct 24, 4:42 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Chris Wright
, (Wed Oct 24, 5:23 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Ray Lee
, (Wed Oct 24, 5:35 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Chris Wright
, (Wed Oct 24, 5:41 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Casey Schaufler
, (Wed Oct 24, 6:03 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Peter Dolding
, (Wed Oct 24, 6:26 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Alan Cox
, (Wed Oct 24, 6:41 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Casey Schaufler
, (Wed Oct 24, 6:42 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, david
, (Wed Oct 24, 6:50 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, david
, (Wed Oct 24, 7:11 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Wed Oct 24, 7:19 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Kyle Moffett
, (Wed Oct 24, 8:50 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Bernd Petrovitsch
, (Thu Oct 25, 2:19 am)
Re: LSM conversion to static interface
, Valdis.Kletnieks
, (Thu Oct 25, 3:23 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Thu Oct 25, 4:38 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Thu Oct 25, 4:44 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Ray Lee
, (Thu Oct 25, 9:04 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Thu Oct 25, 10:10 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Ray Lee
, (Thu Oct 25, 11:17 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Alan Cox
, (Thu Oct 25, 3:21 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Thu Oct 25, 4:09 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Greg KH
, (Thu Oct 25, 7:56 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, david
, (Thu Oct 25, 8:45 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Peter Dolding
, (Thu Oct 25, 10:44 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Fri Oct 26, 12:09 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Fri Oct 26, 2:46 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Greg KH
, (Fri Oct 26, 8:54 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Greg KH
, (Fri Oct 26, 8:58 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Simon Arlott
, (Fri Oct 26, 9:32 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Adrian Bunk
, (Fri Oct 26, 4:26 pm)
eradicating out of tree modules (was: Linux Security *Modu ...
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Sat Oct 27, 7:07 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Tetsuo Handa
, (Sat Oct 27, 7:08 am)
eradicating out of tree modules (was: : Linux Security *Mo ...
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Sat Oct 27, 7:47 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules
, Stefan Richter
, (Sat Oct 27, 10:31 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Sat Oct 27, 11:22 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Sat Oct 27, 11:29 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules (was: : Linux Security ...
, Adrian Bunk
, (Sat Oct 27, 5:55 pm)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules (was: Linux Security * ...
, Adrian Bunk
, (Sat Oct 27, 6:21 pm)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules
, Stefan Richter
, (Sun Oct 28, 2:25 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Sun Oct 28, 5:01 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules
, Stefan Richter
, (Sun Oct 28, 7:37 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules
, Simon Arlott
, (Sun Oct 28, 7:59 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Sun Oct 28, 9:55 am)
RE: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Hua Zhong
, (Sun Oct 28, 11:48 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Sun Oct 28, 11:51 am)
RE: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Hua Zhong
, (Sun Oct 28, 12:05 pm)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules
, Adrian Bunk
, (Sun Oct 28, 12:25 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Sun Oct 28, 12:42 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Sun Oct 28, 1:46 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Crispin Cowan
, (Sun Oct 28, 3:08 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Alan Cox
, (Sun Oct 28, 3:50 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Peter Dolding
, (Sun Oct 28, 4:55 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Sun Oct 28, 10:12 pm)
Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Framework]
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Mon Oct 29, 4:51 pm)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules
, Tilman Schmidt
, (Mon Oct 29, 5:29 pm)
Re: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Fram ...
, Lee Revell
, (Mon Oct 29, 5:46 pm)
Re: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Fram ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Mon Oct 29, 6:19 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Toshiharu Harada
, (Mon Oct 29, 8:23 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Toshiharu Harada
, (Mon Oct 29, 8:37 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Tue Oct 30, 1:40 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Crispin Cowan
, (Tue Oct 30, 1:50 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Toshiharu Harada
, (Tue Oct 30, 2:21 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Tue Oct 30, 2:27 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Bernd Petrovitsch
, (Tue Oct 30, 2:41 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules
, linux-os (Dick Johnson)
, (Tue Oct 30, 6:11 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules
, Xavier Bestel
, (Tue Oct 30, 6:19 am)
Re: eradicating out of tree modules
, Greg KH
, (Tue Oct 30, 8:30 am)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, Crispin Cowan
, (Sun Nov 4, 11:42 pm)
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion ...
, serge
, (Mon Nov 26, 1:42 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Paul Turner
[tg_shares_up rewrite v4 11/11] sched: update tg->shares after cpu.shares write
Brandeburg, Jesse
RE: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 toe1000e migration ...
Robin Lee Powell
NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
Mr. James W. Laferriere
Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc1 , syntax error near unexpected token `;'
Linus Torvalds
Linux 2.6.34-rc4
git
:
Fredrik Kuivinen
Re: fatal: unable to create '.git/index': File exists
Johannes Sixt
Re: How to pull remote branch with specified commit id?
Martin Langhoff
Re: CVS -> SVN -> Git
Rene Herman
"git pull . <branch>" versus "git merge <branch>"
Dan Chokola
Re: how do you "force a pull"?
openbsd-misc
:
Sevan / Venture37
Re: This is what Linus Torvalds calls openBSD crowd
Siju George
This is what Linus Torvalds calls openBSD crowd
new_guy
Longest Uptime?
Bob Beck
Re: observed spamd behavior
frantisek holop
Re: splassert: vwakeup: and friends
linux-netdev
:
Jamie Lokier
Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performa...
Paulius Zaleckas
Re: [RFC] Patch to option HSO driver to the kernel
Timo Teräs
ip xfrm policy semantics
Ron Mercer
[net-next PATCH 2/2] qlge: Version change to v1.00.00.27
Maciej W. Rozycki
Re: [PATCH] flush_work_sync vs. flush_scheduled_work Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event...
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
powerpc/fsl_msi: enable msi allocation in all banks
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[ARM] mmp: avengers lite (pxa168) board bring up
Linux Kernel Mailing List
drivers/acpi: use kasprintf
Linux Kernel Mailing List
swiotlb: replace architecture-specific swiotlb.h with linux/swiotlb.h
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ASoC: fix registration of the SoC card in the Freescale MPC8610 drivers
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate