Re: 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-kernel@...>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <spamtrap@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <a.p.zijlstra@...>, <wfg@...>, <torvalds@...>, <riel@...>
Date: Saturday, October 27, 2007 - 3:14 pm

Andrew Morton wrote:

Longer might be less inaccurate, but without flushing the last data you 
really don't get best accuracy, you just reduce the error. Clearly doing 
fdatasync() is best, since other i/o caused by sync() can skew the results.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.24-rc1: First impressions, Martin Knoblauch, (Fri Oct 26, 10:18 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Oct 26, 11:22 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions, Andrew Morton, (Fri Oct 26, 3:21 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions, Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Oct 27, 1:46 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions, Andrew Morton, (Sat Oct 27, 1:59 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Oct 26, 3:33 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions, Andrew Morton, (Fri Oct 26, 3:42 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions, Bill Davidsen, (Sat Oct 27, 3:14 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Oct 26, 11:29 am)
Re: 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions, Rik van Riel, (Fri Oct 26, 11:49 am)