On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 11:43:28AM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
quoted text > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:48:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Andy, I thought we were going to whine about __inline__ and __inline, too?
>
> Hmmm, I don't remember that coming up, but I'll add it to the todo. I
> am assuming plain 'inline' is preferred over both of these -- yell if
> you meant something else.
Ok, this will be in the next release and is in -next.
WARNING: plain inline is preferred over __inline
#4: FILE: tmp/testset-28768.c:1:
+static __inline int foo(void)
-apw
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro , Andy Whitcroft , (Sat Oct 27, 7:30 am)