Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted text > The gcc lists seem to often get to the point where people quote the
> standard, and that's that. In that environment, the paper standard (that
> hass *nothing* to do with reality) trumps any other argument. "What we do
> is _allowed_ by the standard" seems to be a good argument, even if it
> breaks real code and there is no sane way to avoid doing it.
So we have the great opportunity to change the standard, then
gcc will change ;-)
C is in pre-review phase, and it is taking proposal and correction for the C1x
(so in few kernel release ;-) )
ciao
cate
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: Is gcc thread-unsafe? , Giacomo Catenazzi , (Fri Oct 26, 5:45 pm)