On Friday 26 October 2007 13:30, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
quoted text
> There's a slight problem (other than HCH not liking it) with this
> approach of passing the open file in iattr:  for special files, the
> struct file pointer makes no sense to the filesystem, since it is always
> opened by the generic functions.

So what do you think where the inodes come from for syscalls like fchmod? Out 
of struct file, of course. But your f_op->getattr and f_op->setattr patches 
are meant for passing struct file down to filesystems anyway, so that 
completely contradicts what you are saying above.

quoted text
> So I think the correct solution (which was suggested by Trond and
> others) is to define an f_op->fsetattr() method, which interested
> filesystems can define.

That's nothing but a replacement for ATTR_FILE and iattr->ia_file. Except by 
removing the ATTR_FILE flag, LSMs will no longer get that information for 
distinguishing file descriptor operations from other operations.

AppArmor needs to know when notify_change is called on a file descriptor, but 
it doesn't care about the file descriptor itself. So any way of passing along 
that information will be fine.

Thanks,
Andreas
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/