Re: [Rt2400-devel] [PATCH] rt2500usb - Don't claim 050d:705{0/a}

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adam Baker <linux@...>
Cc: <rt2400-devel@...>, Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <kernel-stuff@...>
Date: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 4:05 pm

> The function that is returning ENODEV is the driver probe function. According 
 > to Documentation/DocBook/writing_usb_driver/ch03.html when that function is 
 > called 
 > 
 > "The driver now needs to verify that this device is actually one that it can 
 > accept. If so, it returns 0. If not, or if any error occurs during 
 > initialization, an errorcode (such as -ENOMEM or -ENODEV) is returned from 
 > the probe function."
 > 
 > It isn't a device the driver can accept so it returns -ENODEV

That's all true but irrelevant.  That error return isn't propagated
back to userspace when it runs modprobe (and in fact it *can't* be
sanely returned to userspace -- what do you do if the probe function
succeeds for two devices and fails for a third?).  So there's not
really any way for userspace to loop through a list of modules until
one succeeds.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] rt2500usb - Don't claim 050d:705{0/a}, Parag Warudkar, (Wed Oct 24, 7:22 pm)
Re: [Rt2400-devel] [PATCH] rt2500usb - Don't claim 050d:705{..., Roland Dreier, (Fri Oct 26, 4:05 pm)