Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
quoted text > On Friday 26 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>>> On Friday 26 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>>> Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>>>>> I have lost battery in 2.6.24-rc1. Without CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS I have
>>>>> no /proc/acpi/battery and cannot test netlink interface because right
>>>>> now there is no consumer of this.
>>>> for /sysfs interface you need to enable power_supply driver.
>>>> or you could apply this patch and power_supply will be selected by
>>>> battery itself.
>>> I already have power_supply module, battery depends on it and it is
>>> autloaded. But I fail to see where I can get battery info in /sys
>> Intent was to put into /sysfs same information:
>> aystarik@samsung:~/client_conf$ ls /sys/class/power_supply/BAT1/
>> alarm charge_full charge_full_design charge_now current_now device
>> manufacturer model_name present status subsystem technology type
>> uevent voltage_min_design voltage_now
>>
>
> is it in -rc1 or can you point me to the patch (I'd rather avoid having to
> pull from different git trees). Thank you.
No, it should be rc1.
quoted text >
> And what about ACPI_PROCFS case? It still needs attention I believe.
As you can see, there is info in /proc too:
quoted text >> aystarik@samsung:~/client_conf$ cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/*
>> alarm: unsupported
>> present: yes
>> design capacity: 4300 mAh
>> last full capacity: 4172 mAh
>> battery technology: rechargeable
>> design voltage: 14800 mV
>> design capacity warning: 208 mAh
>> design capacity low: 41 mAh
>> capacity granularity 1: 41 mAh
>> capacity granularity 2: 41 mAh
>> model number: Bat1
>> serial number: 001
>> battery type: LION
>> OEM info: Pacifi
>> present: yes
>> capacity state: ok
>> charging state: charged
>> present rate: 0 mA
>> remaining capacity: 4172 mAh
>> present voltage: 16518 mV
Your cat's "Bad address" means -EFAULT, according to "man errno".
Please apply this patch to see what exactly failed...
