Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix boot protocol KEEP_SEGMENTS check.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 11:22 am

"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> writes:


Simply that is easier to provide segments that are not fit to be
reloaded before the kernel sets up it's own GDT.  Then to ensure you
stick a GDT someplace that won't get stomped.

Especially before we froze which segments numbers the kernel
would load into the boot protocol.  I would have used this in
places where I was doing 32bit bootloader work as it is just easier to
support.

Eric
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86: Fix boot protocol KEEP_SEGMENTS check., Eric W. Biederman, (Fri Oct 26, 10:29 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix boot protocol KEEP_SEGMENTS check., H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Oct 26, 10:59 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix boot protocol KEEP_SEGMENTS check., Eric W. Biederman, (Fri Oct 26, 11:22 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix boot protocol KEEP_SEGMENTS check., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Oct 26, 11:52 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix boot protocol KEEP_SEGMENTS check., H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Oct 26, 12:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix boot protocol KEEP_SEGMENTS check., Rusty Russell, (Tue Oct 30, 5:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix boot protocol KEEP_SEGMENTS check., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Oct 30, 6:10 pm)