Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 10:55 am

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:


Global reserve means that any cpuset that runs out of memory may exhaust 
the global reserve and thereby impact the rest of the system. The 
emergencies that are currently localized to a subset of the system and 
may lead to the failure of a job may now become global and lead to the 
failure of all jobs running on it.

But Peter mentioned that he has some way of tracking the amount of memory 
used in a certain context (beancounter?) which would address the issue.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Aug 14, 7:21 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Aug 14, 7:36 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Aug 14, 8:29 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Aug 14, 12:32 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Tue Aug 14, 12:41 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Nick Piggin, (Wed Aug 15, 5:22 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Peter Zijlstra, (Wed Aug 15, 6:12 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Peter Zijlstra, (Wed Aug 15, 6:55 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Andi Kleen, (Wed Aug 15, 7:15 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Andi Kleen, (Wed Aug 15, 7:34 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Wed Aug 15, 1:29 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Wed Aug 15, 1:32 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Nick Piggin, (Wed Aug 15, 8:29 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Thu Aug 16, 1:27 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Peter Zijlstra, (Sun Aug 19, 8:51 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Mon Aug 20, 12:15 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Nick Piggin, (Mon Aug 20, 5:28 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Nick Piggin, (Mon Aug 20, 5:32 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Aug 21, 8:29 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Nick Piggin, (Wed Aug 22, 8:02 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Daniel Phillips, (Wed Sep 5, 2:20 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Wed Sep 5, 3:42 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Nick Piggin, (Wed Sep 5, 4:42 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Wed Sep 5, 5:14 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Nick Piggin, (Wed Sep 5, 5:19 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Daniel Phillips, (Wed Sep 5, 9:16 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Mike Snitzer, (Fri Sep 7, 10:12 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 10, 12:25 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 10, 12:29 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Sep 10, 12:37 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 10, 12:41 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Sep 10, 12:55 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Sep 10, 12:55 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 10, 1:17 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Mon Sep 10, 1:22 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Sep 10, 1:48 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Sep 10, 1:48 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Nick Piggin, (Tue Sep 11, 12:41 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Peter Zijlstra, (Wed Sep 12, 3:52 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Wed Sep 12, 3:39 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Wed Sep 12, 3:47 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Sep 13, 1:19 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Thu Sep 13, 11:32 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Sep 13, 12:24 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Daniel Phillips, (Mon Sep 17, 5:28 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Mike Snitzer, (Mon Sep 17, 8:27 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Daniel Phillips, (Mon Sep 17, 10:37 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Peter Zijlstra, (Tue Sep 18, 2:30 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Pavel Machek, (Fri Oct 26, 10:44 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Christoph Lameter, (Fri Oct 26, 10:55 am)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Daniel Phillips, (Sat Oct 27, 3:58 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/3] Recursive reclaim (on __PF_MEMALLOC), Daniel Phillips, (Sat Oct 27, 4:08 pm)