Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » October » 26

[PATCH 0/2] Japanese translation of Documentation/SubmittingPatches

Previous thread: RE: Upcomming CRIS patches by Mikael Starvik on Friday, October 26, 2007 - 2:21 am. (5 messages)

Next thread: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview by jjohansen on Friday, October 26, 2007 - 2:40 am. (12 messages)
[view original message]
From: Keiichi KII <k-keiichi@...>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Cc: <gregkh@...>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Japanese translation of Documentation/SubmittingPatches
Date: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 2:48 am

From: Keiichi Kii <k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com>


Hi all,


Currently, HOWTO and stable_api_nonsense.txt are included in

Documentation/"each country"/ as policy documents.

Greg K-H said the following in this thread:


SubmittingPatches document includes important information

about how to generate patch and write e-mail related to kernel

development.


So, I wish SubmittingPatches is included in Documentation/"each country"/

as policy documents.

How do you think about this?


I attach two patches(one fixes a typo, the other adds SubmittingPatches

translated into Japanese to Documentation/ja_JP directory).

These patches are for linux-2.6.23.


The translated SubmittingPatches has already been reviewed by JF project.

JF project is the Japanese equivalent of LDP.


Your comments are very welcome.


Signed-off-by: Keiichi Kii <k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com>

--

Keiichi KII

NEC Corporation OSS Platform Development Division

E-mail: k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com


-
[view original message]
From: Keiichi KII <k-keiichi@...>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Cc: <gregkh@...>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] add SubmittingPatches to Documentation/ja_JP
Date: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 2:55 am

From: Keiichi Kii <k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com>


This patch adds SubmittingPatches translated into Japanese to

Documentation/ja_JP directory.


I attach the patch because there is a possibility that MUA

will change the character encoding sometimes.


Signed-off-by: Keiichi KII <k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com>

--

Keiichi KII

NEC Corporation OSS Platform Development Division

E-mail: k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com
[view original message]
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@...>
To: <k-keiichi@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <gregkh@...>, <apw@...>, <yoshfuji@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] add SubmittingPatches to Documentation/ja_JP
Date: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 3:12 am

Hello.


Basically okay, but please refer to the original DCO

document.


Your mailer is broken.  You should include "charset" parameter

in your multipart.  Maybe it is better to prepare a git repository,

or attach it as a binary (application/octet-stream).


--yoshfuji


-
[view original message]
From: Keiichi KII <k-keiichi@...>
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <gregkh@...>, <apw@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] add SubmittingPatches to Documentation/ja_JP
Date: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 7:48 am

What is "DCO document"?

DCO stands for Developer's Certificate of Origin in SumittingPatches?

If so, I will put original text of the DCO into the translated SubmittingPatches.


Thanks, I couldn't notice possibility of false recognition of character code

because there was no probelm in my environment.

But, I used mew as MUA and the patch was recognized as Ascii, not UTF-8.

I think alternative based on your suggestions.


--

Keiichi KII

NEC Corporation OSS Platform Development Division

E-mail: k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com


-
[view original message]
From: Keiichi KII <k-keiichi@...>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Cc: <gregkh@...>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] fix typo in SubmittingPatches
Date: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 2:51 am

From: Keiichi Kii <k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com>


Fix typo.


Signed-off-by: Keiichi Kii <k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com>

Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>

---

Index: trunk/Documentation/SubmittingPatches

===================================================================

--- trunk.orig/Documentation/SubmittingPatches

+++ trunk/Documentation/SubmittingPatches

@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ section Linus Computer Science 101.

 Nuff said.  If your code deviates too much from this, it is likely

 to be rejected without further review, and without comment.


-Once significant exception is when moving code from one file to

+One significant exception is when moving code from one file to

 another in this case you should not modify the moved code at all in

 the same patch which moves it.  This clearly delineates the act of

 moving the code and your changes.  This greatly aids review of the


--

Keiichi KII

NEC Corporation OSS Platform Development Division

E-mail: k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com

-
[view original message]
From: Keiichi KII <k-keiichi@...>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Cc: <gregkh@...>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fix typo in SubmittingPatches
Date: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 6:51 am

From: Keiichi Kii <k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com>


Greg, could you replace old patch with new one?


Fix typo and insert " -- " between clauses.


Signed-off-by: Keiichi Kii <k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com>

Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>

---

Index: trunk/Documentation/SubmittingPatches

===================================================================

--- trunk.orig/Documentation/SubmittingPatches

+++ trunk/Documentation/SubmittingPatches

@@ -464,8 +464,8 @@ section Linus Computer Science 101.

 Nuff said.  If your code deviates too much from this, it is likely

 to be rejected without further review, and without comment.


-Once significant exception is when moving code from one file to

-another in this case you should not modify the moved code at all in

+One significant exception is when moving code from one file to

+another -- in this case you should not modify the moved code at all in

 the same patch which moves it.  This clearly delineates the act of

 moving the code and your changes.  This greatly aids review of the

 actual differences and allows tools to better track the history of


--

Keiichi KII

NEC Corporation OSS Platform Development Division

E-mail: k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com

-
[view original message]
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...>
To: Keiichi KII <k-keiichi@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <gregkh@...>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fix typo in SubmittingPatches
Date: Friday, October 26, 2007 - 11:50 pm

That first sentence is still broken.  It should be more like this,

with either a ":" or ";" or " -- " between clauses:


One significant exception is when moving code from one file to

another -- in this case you should not modify the moved code at all in

the same patch which moves it.


---

~Randy

-
[view original message]
From: Keiichi KII <k-keiichi@...>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <gregkh@...>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fix typo in SubmittingPatches
Date: Monday, October 29, 2007 - 6:50 am

Tahnks for your point.

I will fix this sentence as above.


--

Keiichi KII

NEC Corporation OSS Platform Development Division

E-mail: k-keiichi@bx.jp.nec.com

-
Previous thread: RE: Upcomming CRIS patches by Mikael Starvik on Friday, October 26, 2007 - 2:21 am. (5 messages)

Next thread: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview by jjohansen on Friday, October 26, 2007 - 2:40 am. (12 messages)