On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:40:44 -0700, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
quoted text
> > Now rc1 is released.  Any chances for this patch?
> > If none, I should push other workaround to fix this issue on 2.6.24.
> 
> I don't know what patch you're referring to.  I don't appear to have
> whatever-patch-this-is queued up anywhere?

Here is an original patch I proposed (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/18/292)

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: serial: do not call ->pm() on initialization for console port
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>

If the port was already enabled as a serial console, there is no need
to call pm callback to power it up.  This patch fixes serial console
initialization on serial_txx9 driver.

Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
---
diff --git a/drivers/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/serial/serial_core.c
index 68aa4da..5a38076 100644
--- a/drivers/serial/serial_core.c
+++ b/drivers/serial/serial_core.c
@@ -2326,7 +2326,6 @@ int uart_add_one_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port)
 	}
 
 	state->port = port;
-	state->pm_state = -1;
 
 	port->cons = drv->cons;
 	port->info = state->info;
@@ -2336,6 +2335,7 @@ int uart_add_one_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port)
 	 * initialised.
 	 */
 	if (!(uart_console(port) && (port->cons->flags & CON_ENABLED))) {
+		state->pm_state = -1;
 		spin_lock_init(&port->lock);
 		lockdep_set_class(&port->lock, &port_lock_key);
 	}

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 22:36:44 +0100, Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
quoted text
> "Further investigation" is quite a good indication that a patch needs to
> be worked on, no?  In any case, I'm ill at the moment, so things are very
> much on hold.

OK, then I'd like to propose this alternative
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/18/301).  This should be work regardless
of the patch above.

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: serial: Fix serial_txx9 console initialization
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>

Now serial_core calls ->pm() on initialization even if the port was
used for console.  This behaviour breaks serial_txx9 console since The
serial_txx9 driver initialize its port entirely on its ->pm() method
if new state was 0.  This patch adds checking for oldstate value to
fix this probelm.

Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
---
diff --git a/drivers/serial/serial_txx9.c b/drivers/serial/serial_txx9.c
index 6846a6c..7ad2192 100644
--- a/drivers/serial/serial_txx9.c
+++ b/drivers/serial/serial_txx9.c
@@ -657,7 +657,15 @@ static void
 serial_txx9_pm(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int state,
 	      unsigned int oldstate)
 {
-	if (state == 0)
+	/*
+	 * If oldstate was -1 this is called from
+	 * uart_configure_port().  In this case do not initialize the
+	 * port now, because the port was already initialized (for
+	 * non-console port) or should not be initialized here (for
+	 * console port).  If we initialized the port here we lose
+	 * serial console settings.
+	 */
+	if (state == 0 && oldstate != -1)
 		serial_txx9_initialize(port);
 }


-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/