Am 25.10.2007 00:31 schrieb Adrian Bunk:=2E =20 This argument seems to start from the assumption that any externally maintained kernel code *can* get into the kernel, which doesn't stand up to reality. Once you admit that there is code which, for very good reasons, won't ever be accepted into the mainline kernel tree, what you are saying amounts to: "Code that isn't fit to be included in the mainline kernel isn't fit to exist at all." I'm not sure I can agree with that. --=20 Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Unge=C3=B6ffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe R=C3=BCckseite)
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Mark Lord | 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Marcin Slusarz | Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1: build failure (x86) |
| Balbir Singh | Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] RSS controller core |
git: | |
| bcpa | Binkley/Rfmaill/Cnews scripts?.. |
| Rogier Wolff | Re: MIPS R3000 board to run Linux, anyone? |
| Gary Kahn | compiled ghostscript, got 2 megabyte executable |
| Joshua Lobel | Does anyone know anything about LOCUS' DOS MERGE running on Linux |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
