I've been looking at 'IRQ off' latency in the Linux kernel, on
version 2.6.22 for target using an ARM processor.
I use a serial console, at 115200 bps.
I've noticed that calls to printk disable interrupts for
excessively long times. I have a long test printk of
over 200 chars, that holds interrupts off for 24 milliseconds.
The kernel drops ticks in this case. I changed to HZ=1000
to more easily see the dropped ticks, and I'm losing about
23 ticks (no surprise there).
I see long interrupt off periods for vprintk and release_console_sem,
both in kernel/printk.c
Results with HRT disabled, HZ=1000:
Below is output from a test printk I inserted into sys_sync().
I have PRINTK_TIMES turned on.
/proc # sync
[ 2292.851106] I'm now in the sys_sync system call, performing an extremely long
printk with lots of words that go on and on and on and if it gets any longer I
just might scream but that's beside the point, as a test of interrupt disable ti
me for the printk system itself.
[ 2292.895751] interval=44816825, jiffies=22
[ 2292.904529] This is a shorter string - will we drop jiffies here??
[ 2292.933729] interval=29173886, jiffies=23
/proc # sync
[ 2296.353092] I'm now in the sys_sync system call, performing an extremely long
printk with lots of words that go on and on and on and if it gets any longer I
just might scream but that's beside the point, as a test of interrupt disable ti
me for the printk system itself.
[ 2296.377637] interval=24573237, jiffies=1
[ 2296.381856] This is a shorter string - will we drop jiffies here??
[ 2296.388356] interval=6488141, jiffies=1
--------------------------
Data from irq_latency measurement tool
Notes:
* 24 ms vprintk = long printk
* 6 ms printk = shorter printk
* 4 ms printk = timing report printks
* I don't know what the heck that preempt_schedule_irq is doing in there.
I only saw that once, on this test.
/proc # cat irq_latency
irq latency worst 20 @ CPU 0
filter: 0
0.024348 vprintk
0.024348 vprintk
0.024343 vprintk
0.006439 vprintk
0.006439 vprintk
0.006338 vprintk
0.004260 preempt_schedule_irq
0.004248 vprintk
0.004248 vprintk
0.004247 vprintk
0.004072 vprintk
0.003966 vprintk
0.000345 latency_start
0.000158 mpu_timer1 26
0.000157 mpu_timer1 26
0.000157 mpu_timer1 26
0.000156 mpu_timer1 26
0.000151 mpu_timer1 26
0.000150 mpu_timer1 26
0.000150 mpu_timer1 26
It looks like vprintk() holds off interrupts for the entire
duration of outputting the data to the serial console.
release_console_sem() appears to as well.
The local_irq_save and restore appear to have been added
in February, 2007 by Mathieu.
Are these are really needed, with all this other locking
going on? Any ideas for fixing this?
-- Tim
=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================
-
| Jeff Garzik | Re: Wasting our Freedom |
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
| Mathieu Desnoyers | [RFC patch 08/18] cnt32_to_63 should use smp_rmb() |
| Richard Hughes | Add INPUT support to toshiba_acpi |
git: | |
| Jan | [PATCH/RFC] Allow writing loose objects that are corrupted in a pack file |
| Elijah Newren | Trying to use git-filter-branch to compress history by removing large, obsolete bi... |
| Thomas Koch | is gitosis secure? |
| Matthieu Moy | git push to a non-bare repository |
| frantisek holop | booting openbsd on eee without cd-rom |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Otto Moerbeek | Re: identifying sparse files and get ride of them trick available? |
| Renaud Allard | very weak bridge performance |
| Linux Kernel Mailing List | [ALSA] hda: Added new IDT codec family |
| Linux Kernel Mailing List | usb-storage: clean up unusual_devs.h |
| Linux Kernel Mailing List | USB: Enhance usage of pm_message_t |
| Linux Kernel Mailing List | resource: allow MMIO exclusivity for device drivers |
