On 10/25/07, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
quoted text
> Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > is there any particular reason we're using -traditional in
> > EXTRA_AFLAGS in Makefiles?
> >
>
> What?  Where?  I thought I removed them all.  Or is this from the x86_64
> tree?

This is from arch/x86/kernel/Makefile_64

quoted text
> > I'd suggest just removing it, but obviously, there might well be
> > people with good reasons for it to stay (The same effect of token
> > pasting can be achieved in some ways, so if -traditional stays, that's
> > not the greatest problem in the world... just that token pasting in
> > asm files will diverge from the way in which we (-)traditionally do
> > ;-) )
> >
> > So, does any one have a word on that?
> >
>
>
> Kill -traditional where ever it may be.  You might need to fix up some
> cruft in the process, but shouldn't be too hard.
>
I only feel confortable about killing it from x86_64 or any other
arches I may have access to. Otherwise, there's no way I can fix up
the crufts ;)

A patch for Makefile_64 will follow in a while.

-- 
Glauber de Oliveira Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net

"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/