Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » October » 24

Re: [2.6 patch] #if 0 cpufreq.c:cpufreq_get()

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@...>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, <davej@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <cpufreq@...>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] #if 0 cpufreq.c:cpufreq_get()
Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 - 1:17 pm

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:38:39AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

... and such an assumption which would make it impossible to use
the LCD controller on StrongARM-11x0 processors.

This is precisely why we have CPUFREQ - so that hardware which needs
to be re-timed when the CPU frequency changes can get notified of that
event and take the appropriate action.  It exists.  It works.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[2.6 patch] #if 0 cpufreq.c:cpufreq_get(), Adrian Bunk, (Wed Oct 24, 12:23 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] #if 0 cpufreq.c:cpufreq_get(), Dave Jones, (Wed Oct 24, 2:39 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] #if 0 cpufreq.c:cpufreq_get(), Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Oct 24, 12:38 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] #if 0 cpufreq.c:cpufreq_get(), Russell King, (Wed Oct 24, 1:17 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] #if 0 cpufreq.c:cpufreq_get(), Russell King, (Wed Oct 24, 12:32 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] #if 0 cpufreq.c:cpufreq_get(), Adrian Bunk, (Wed Oct 24, 12:46 pm)